Comparative analysis of mapping services for integrating interactive maps in web development

Abstract

This article explores key mapping services for integrating interactive maps in web development, focusing on Google Maps, Mapbox, and solutions based on OpenStreetMap. The relevance of the study stems from the need to select an optimal tool for spatial data visualization, as a poor choice can lead to increased costs, limited functionality, and development complications. It was found that the main challenge for developers lies in choosing between feature-rich commercial platforms and more flexible, lower-cost solutions that require additional technical skills to implement. The aim of the research is to conduct a comparative analysis of Google Maps, Mapbox, and OpenStreetMap. The study employs methods of comparative evaluation based on functionality, pricing models, licensing conditions, and ease of integration. The integration process of each service is demonstrated through practical code examples with visualized outputs. The results show that Google Maps and Mapbox offer out-of-the-box solutions with broad functionality, while OpenStreetMap provides maximum flexibility and is free of charge, though often reliant on the integration of third-party tools, some of which may be paid. The conclusion emphasizes that there is no universal solution the optimal choice depends on project priorities: Google Maps is suitable for applications requiring a wide range of integrated features, Mapbox is best for projects with high customization needs, and OpenStreetMap is ideal for low-budget solutions demanding flexibility