Indicators and criteria for assessing the level of academic integrity of applicants for higher education.
Abstract
The scientific article substantiates the indicators of academic integrity of applicants for higher education. According to each indicator of academic integrity, mathematical criteria for assessing their level are proposed. Additionally, it is proposed to calculate integral index of academic integrity of applicants of higher education. An interdisciplinary connection between academic integrity and the cultural characteristics of applicants for higher education has been established. Scientific novelty. For the first time, separate indicators and criteria for assessing the level of academic integrity of applicants for higher education have been proposed. Practical significance. Based on the obtained indicators and criteria, a methodology for assessing the level of academic integrity of applicants for higher education can be developed.
References
2. The Law Of Ukraine "On Education". URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19/page3. (in Ukraininan).
3. Recommendations for ensuring the principles of academic integrity. Sub-Commission 303 "Academic integrity" of the Scientific and methodological Commission 15 on organizational and methodological support of Higher Education. Moscow: Ministry of education and science of Ukraine, 2016. 24 p. (in Ukraininan).
4. DiVall M., Schlesselman L. Academic Dishonesty: Whose Fault is it Anyway? URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
articles/PMC4857630.
5. Busch P., Bilgin A. Student and Staff Understanding and Reaction: Academic Integrity in an Australian University. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9214-2.
6. Academic integrity: compliance issues and distribution priorities among young scientists: Col. monogr. / for zag. edited by N.G. Sorokina, A.E. Artyukhov, and I.O. Degtyareva. Dnipro: DRYDU NADU, 2017. 169 р. (in Ukraininan).
7. Avdeeva N.V., Ivanova E.N. Methodology and methodology of objective assessment of borrowings in academic texts. Open education. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 6. Pp. 22 – 30. URL: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2020-6-22-30. (in Russian).
8. Svechkarev V. G., Ashkhamakhov K. I., Dvoynikova E. S., Guchetl I. N. Method of checking works for borrowings in the “Anti-plagiatum.vuz” system for prevention of the fraud. Business. Education. Law. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 395–400.
9. What percentage of similarity can be considered acceptable for academic papers? Academic integrity. January 26, 2021. URL: https://unicheck.com/ua/blog/yakyj-vidsotok-shozhosti-mozhna-vvazhaty-dopustymym-dlya-akademichnyh-robit. (in Ukraininan).
10. Kharseeva O.V. Expediency and limits of using automated systems when checking scientific papers for the presence of borrowings. Modern Science: from Plagiarism to Academic Honesty: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, (Kursk, April 12, 2019). Pp. 142 – 148.
Abstract views: 109 PDF Downloads: 117
