Some questions of qualimetry in technological systems production.
Abstract
Some issues of qualimetry in production and technological systems are revealed. The scheme of researches concerning estimation, forecasting and quality control of products from a metalwork and their production and technological systems is resulted. The most significant procedures for solving qualimetry problems are identified. A strategy for comprehensive assessment of the quality of equipment and production and technological systems is proposed. It is emphasized that to assess the quality of production and technological systems of manufacturing products developed a methodology based on the definition of a dynamic comprehensive quality indicator. Each of the individual indicators of quality of production and technological system is substantiated, the list of which includes the indicator of continuity, specialization, implementation of plans, automation of production and technological system, production defects, progressiveness and technical and economic efficiency. The method of calculation of each of the listed unit indicators of quality of production and technological system is considered. It is emphasized that in order to determine a dynamic complex indicator of the quality of the production process, in addition to the calculation of individual indicators of the quality of the production process, the weighting factors of each indicator must be determined. Weights can be determined by various methods, for example, the method of parametric and cost regression, the method of limit and nominal values, the method of equivalent ratios, the expert method. It is noted that the accuracy of expert assessments is determined by the consistency of expert opinions, and the degree of coincidence of expert assessments is expressed by the concordance coefficient. It is noted that in the approach to qualimetry the main part is selected, which determines the quality of quantitative expression of the production and technological system. It is substantiated that the selected basic part is accepted by the expert as a standard of quantitative analysis of other parts in the field of research. Next, the parameters are calculated, which are called the quality parameters of the production and technological system.
References
Chernyak O.M., Sorokolat N.A., Kanitskaya I.V. Application of the integration method to assess the quality of qualimetry objects. Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Ser. : New solutions in modern technologies: coll. Science. пр. = Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Ser. : New solutions in modern technology: col. of sci. papers. Kharkiv: NTU "KhPI", 2020. № 4 (6). P.93-98.
Azgaldov G.G., Glichev A.V., Panov V.P. What is quality ?. Moscow: Economics, 1968. 135 p.
Chernyak O.M., Sorokolat N.A., Kanytska I.V. Graphoanalytical method for determining the complex quality indicator of qualimetry objects. The current state of research and technology in industry. 2020. № 4 (14). Pp. 169-175.
Dmitrenko GA, Anufrieva OL, Burlaenko TI, Medvid VV Qualimetry in management: humanistic context: textbook. way. / (edited by GA Dmitrenko). Kyiv: Agrarian Education Publishing House, 2016. 335 p.
Kurbatov DI, Zaloga VO Fundamental aspects of decision-making in the system of instrumental support of machine-building industries "(intermediate): report on research work, 2016. 174 p. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/324270347.pdf (access date: 11.04.2021)
Grozny I.S. Qualimetric assessment of the quality of production processes. Black Sea Economic Studies. 2016. Vip. 1. pp. 39-42.
Shostakovskaya A.V. Evaluation of the quality of production processes of industrial enterprises. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Economics and Intellectual Property. 2017. S. 184–186.
Rozental, O.M. & Averbukh, A.I. Introduction to water qualimetry. Water resources. 2013. Vol. 40(4). P. 447–461.
Freivalds A., Niebel, B. Niebel`s Methods, Standards & Work Design, 12th Ed. New York: Mc-Graw Hill, 2009. 736 р.
Cherniak O., Trishch R., Kim N., Ratajczak S. Quantitative assessment of working conditions in the workplace. Engineering Management in Production and Services. 2020. Vol. 12 (2). P. 99–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2020-0014
Trisch R., Gorbenko E., Dotsenko N., Kim N., Kiporenko A. Development of qualimetric approaches to the processes of quality management system at enterprises ac-cording to international standards of the ISO 9000 series. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2016. № 4/3 (82). P. 18–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.75503
Hashemkhani Zolfanir S., Maknoon E., Zavadskas K. Multiple Nash equilibriums and evaluation of strategies. New application of MCDM methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2015. Vol. 16. P. 290–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846 / 16111699.2014.967715
Ginevičius R., Suhajda K., Šimkūnaitė J. Lithuanian experience of quantitative evaluation of socioeconomic system position bymulticriteriamethods.Procedia–SocialandBehavioralSciences.2014.№ 110.P. 952–960.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.941
Abstract views: 134 PDF Downloads: 88